| |
White House Considers Pre-Midterm
Package to Spur Jobs
WASHINGTON
(By
Anne E. Kornblut and Lori
Montgomery, Washington Post) September 3, 2010 — With just two
months until the November elections, the White House is seriously weighing a
package of business tax breaks - potentially worth hundreds of billions of
dollars - to spur hiring and combat Republican charges Democratic tax
policies hurt small businesses, according to people with knowledge of the
deliberations.
Among the options under consideration are a temporary payroll-tax holiday and a
permanent extension of the now-expired research-and-development tax credit,
which rewards companies that conduct research into new technologies within the
United States.
Administration officials have struggled to develop new economic policies and an
effective message to blunt expected Republican gains in Congress and defuse
complaints from Democrats that President Obama is fumbling the issue most
important to voters. Following Obama's vacation and focus on foreign policy in
recent weeks, White House advisers have arranged a series of economic events for
the president next week, including two trips to swing states and a news
conference.
"We'll continue to do everything we can, understanding that recovery will
require persistent effort. There are no silver bullets," senior Obama adviser
David Axelrod said in an interview Thursday. "At the same time, we have to make
clear our ideas and theirs, and the fact the Washington Republicans, having
helped create this recession, have attempted to block our every effort to deal
with it."
But with the unemployment rate expected to rise again in jobs numbers due out
Friday, panic is setting in among many Democratic candidates who fear it is too
late for Obama to convince voters he understands the depth of the nation's
economic woes and can fix them.
White House officials cautioned no tax cuts have been settled on and a
more limited measure could emerge. Policy staffers are debating a range of
options. For example, a payroll-tax holiday - a top priority of many business
groups - could be applied only to new hires or extended to current employees. It
could be limited to small businesses or extended to larger firms.
Timing problems
If administration officials can agree on a policy path, it is not clear it
would be approved in the current environment on Capitol Hill. And even if
Congress did approve new measures to bolster the economy, they would probably
come too late to make a difference in the lives of recession-weary voters before
the midterms.
"Substantively, there is nothing they could do between now and Election Day that
would have any measurable effect on the economy. Nothing," said the Brookings
Institution's William Galston, who was a domestic-policy adviser to President
Bill Clinton.
Over the past year, with the jobless rate hovering near 10 percent, Obama has
repeatedly promised to shift from other matters to the economy. He did so again
this week, saying during his Oval Office address on Iraq he would turn to
the economy "in the days to come."
But some Democratic candidates and political operatives feel the president is
not doing enough to help them keep control of Congress, privately expressing
frustration Obama has recently emphasized issues other than the economy.
"We did the mosque, Katrina, Iraq, and now Middle East peace?" said a Democratic
strategist who works closely with multiple candidates and spoke on the condition
of anonymity. "And in between you redo the Oval Office? It has become a joke."
Many economists say Obama's policies have been reasonably effective at pulling
the nation back from recession. Last year's stimulus package - now estimated to
cost $814 billion - protected as many as 3.3 million jobs, according the
independent Congressional Budget Office.
Nonetheless, Obama's efforts to give the economy another boost have been stymied
since the spring, when members of both parties became keenly aware of rising
public concern about the national debt.
Election Day looms
Last November, Obama announced he would turn his attention to unemployment,
calling it "one of the great challenges that remains in our economy." He
declared the same intent two months later, telling House Democrats he would
focus relentlessly on job creation "over the next several months." Senior aides
went on television pledging the mantra would become "jobs, jobs, jobs."
But other matters - health care, the BP oil spill - continually stole the
limelight, creating the impression, some Democrats complain, the president
was barely focused on the economy at all.
His advisers described his attentiveness - noting, for example, he
discussed the economy with New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) for 15
minutes before golfing - but got little traction.
"Obviously it's going to be hard to get anything done before the election, but
it's really important for him to try, and to make the case to the American
people he's trying to do something and the Republicans aren't letting him,"
said Steve Elmendorf, a Democratic strategist. "We are at the final moments
here."
Obama has another incentive to act: Tax cuts enacted during the George W. Bush
administration are scheduled to expire in January, and Democrats - accused by
Republicans of plotting to let them vanish - feel compelled to do something
before the midterms.
Obama campaigned on a pledge to let cuts expire for the richest 2 percent of
households, but some Democrats say the economy is too weak to raise anyone's
taxes right now. And they fear a backlash from small-business owners who could
be hit with higher taxes.
Pairing targeted business tax breaks with an extension of middle-class tax cuts
could help alleviate those problems.
Permanently extending the research credit would cost roughly $100 billion over
the next decade, tax analysts said. And depending on its form and duration, a
payroll-tax holiday could cost more than $300 billion. While costing
significantly less than last year's stimulus package, both ideas would be far
more dramatic than anything the White House has so far acknowledged considering.
More spending on infrastructure, particularly transportation projects, is also
under discussion. But it would be easier for a package composed purely of tax
cuts to "avoid the stain of a 'bailout' or 'stimulus' label," said one official
familiar with the talks, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the
deliberations were private.
The president could roll out additional measures as soon as next week. Senate
leaders hope to begin debating the tax issue in late September.
|
|
. |
![]() |
|
|