Redistricting Suits Focus on Increasing 24
Congress House Hispanic Members by Decreasing
42 Black Members
NEW YORK CITY & SANTA FE, NM (Richard
E. Cohen, Politico) June 8, 2011
―
The looming Illinois and Texas legal challenges will be key tests of the surging
Hispanic population across the nation and that community’s demand for more
political influence.
The 2010 census counted 50.5 million Hispanics and 38.9 million blacks —
compared with 35.3 million Hispanics and 34.7 million blacks in 2000. But those
figures have not translated into Hispanic clout in Congress, where — not
including delegates or members of Portuguese ancestry — they have 24 House
members (17 Democrats and seven Republicans), compared with 42 black
representatives (40 Democrats and two Republicans).
Illinois Republicans and Texas Democrats have few things in common. But they are
borrowing from the same playbook when it comes to congressional redistricting —
both are prepping lawsuits aimed at increasing their respective states’
Hispanic-majority districts.
Their similar
strategies — both plan to file complaints under the
Voting Rights Act — are not a result of a high-minded
interest to protect the civil rights of the nation’s
largest minority group, though Hispanics clearly would
benefit in each case. Nor are the two groups sharing
notes as they proceed with lawsuits that could work
their way to the Supreme Court.
What the
groups do share is the downtrodden partisan minority
status in their home states. And they hope to win in
federal court what they have failed to achieve
legislatively in Springfield and Austin.
The lawsuits
won’t be filed until Govs. Pat Quinn (D-Ill.) and Rick
Perry (R-Texas) sign the redistricting laws — which
could be in the next week or two.
“We are very
concerned this proposal does not fairly represent the
significant growth that has occurred in the Hispanic
community,” Illinois’s 11 House Republicans wrote in a
statement May 27, after Democrats released their plan.
“We will take whatever steps necessary to achieve a map
that more fairly represents the people of Illinois.”
Some of the
11 are already going their own way in staking claim to a
new district — and against one another — which could
throw a wrench in their legal strategy. But all have
been working with former Illinois Attorney General Ty
Fahner, a Republican and now a partner at Mayer Brown in
Chicago, on their planned lawsuit. Delegation members
and other GOP sources said the group has agreed not to
publicly discuss the details of those conversations.
The 2010
census found Illinois’s Hispanic population booming,
with an increase of more than 500,000 in the past
decade, for a total of 2.03 million Hispanics and 1.87
million blacks. Even in Cook County, with its historic
and vibrant African-American community, blacks
outnumbered Hispanics by only 43,000. The redistricting
plan approved by the Legislature last week, which could
yield as many as five additional Democratic seats,
retains the current one majority-Hispanic and three
majority-black districts. Complicating the picture is
the fact that Hispanic populations sprawl throughout the
Chicago metropolitan area, while black populations are
concentrated in three revamped Cook County-based
districts that are barely more than 50 percent black.
One Illinois
House Republican said the lack of a second Hispanic
district likely will be the cornerstone of the GOP’s
effort to overturn the redistricting plan. “Our goal is
districts that are drawn fair and balanced,” he said. If
a second Hispanic-majority district is created,
Republicans expect a net increase of at least two House
seats.
A House Democrat from Illinois — who, like the
Republican, would not speak for attribution — cautioned
last week the state plan could be overturned by a
federal court. The lawmaker cited his concern more than
two-thirds of the judges in the federal circuit court
that includes Illinois were nominated by Republican
presidents.
In Texas, Democrats are awaiting the outcome of the
Legislature’s special session and the evolving details
of the Republican plan; the GOP’s latest version
includes seven Hispanic districts for Democrats and one
for a Republican incumbent. State Rep. Marc Veasey, the
only Democratic lawmaker to offer an alternative map,
said his plan could offer an alternative for court
review.
Veasey’s
version would create nine Hispanic-majority districts
and four districts that likely would elect a black
representative — compared with three seats on the
current map that Republicans would retain on the new
map.
Hispanics are spread across Texas, making up 38 percent
of the state’s total population. Outraged Democrats
contend the new map undercuts Hispanics’ explosive
population growth — they represent 90 percent of the
state’s population gain in the past decade — by aiming
to hand Republicans three of the four new seats. Last
year, two GOP challengers — including one Latino —
ousted Hispanic Democrats in heavily Hispanic districts
in south Texas, which could further complicate the court
battle.
In their latest redistricting plan, Texas Republicans
did not create a Hispanic-majority district in the
Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, even though leaders of
their congressional delegation have advocated one and
Dallas and Tarrant counties have nearly 1.4 million
Hispanics.
“By going for the maximum plan, Republicans are doing a
real big dice roll,” said a veteran Texas Democrat.
“Republican lawyers must know they risk losing it all.”
He said Republicans’ failure to reach out to Hispanics
amounts to “dumb politics.”
The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund,
which has been actively involved in redistricting, has
lashed out at the plans in Illinois and Texas. It has
given Texas Republicans an “F” for their work on
redistricting, and MALDEF director of litigation Nina
Perales criticized Illinois’s Democratic Legislature for
dividing Latino neighborhoods and elevating “incumbency
protection over respect for the Latino community.”
But the Hispanic community in Illinois has been split on
redistricting, with some local groups working closely
with the Democratic Party. MALDEF says it takes a
nonpartisan approach, though it rarely works directly
with Republicans. GOP leaders hope MALDEF joins their
Illinois lawsuit — the group’s involvement would
represent a big coup for Republicans.
Republican redistricting strategists reject the
suggestion of similarities between the Illinois and
Texas challenges. Republican State Leadership Committee
President Chris Jankowski, who is working with local
officials on redistricting, said it would be a mistake
for the GOP to treat Hispanics as a monolithic foe: “We
need to compete. Or we will be a minority party for a
long time.”