| |
Racism
Rampant in Arizona:
Similarities of South
Africa (Apartheid)
and Arizona
(SB
1070)
PHOENIX
(By
Jon
Garrido, The Jon Garrido Network
and encyclopedia)
July 27,
2010
Apartheid (Afrikaners, South
African White persons, separateness) was a system of legal racial segregation
enforced by the National Party government in South Africa between 1948 and 1994,
under which the rights of the majority Black inhabitants of South Africa
were taken away and minority rule by white persons who were the only persons who could vote was decreed by the "Rule of Law."
Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times, but apartheid as an
official policy was introduced following the general election of 1948. New
legislation classified inhabitants into racial groups ("black" and "white"),
and residential areas were segregated, by means of forced removals. From 1958,
black persons were deprived of their citizenship. The government segregated
education, property ownership,
medical care,
and other
public services, and provided black persons with services much less in quality to those of
white persons.
Apartheid sparked significant internal resistance and violence as well as a long
trade embargo against South Africa. A series of popular uprisings and
protests were met with the banning of opposition and imprisoning of
anti-apartheid leaders. As unrest spread and became more violent, state
organizations responded with increasing repression and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s failed to quell the mounting opposition and
in 1990, President Frederik Willem de Klerk began negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial democratic elections in 1994, which were won by the
African National Congress under Nelson Mandela. The vestiges of apartheid still
shape South African politics and society.
The
goal to completely dominate South Africa was accomplished using the Rule of
Law to drastically diminish Civil Rights, services of medical, education,
business and property rights provided to Black persons to force them to leave
South Africa. By manipulating the legislative process to gain control of the
Rule of Law to author
laws to benefit white persons at the expense of Black
persons, the White persons South African Afrikaners were for a considerable time ruthless
toward Black persons in South Africa creating severe consequences for opposing
the diminishing of their human rights. The Rule of Law
served as a tool for the government
of South Africa to
suppress in a legalistic fashion
to achieve its goal to force Black persons to leave South Africa.
Today the same
process used in South Africa is being used in Arizona as the strategy to
diminish the number of future Hispanic voters to leave Arizona.
In Arizona, to maintain white control of elective offices by forcing the ever increasing
numbers of Hispanics to leave Arizona by diminishing the
number of Hispanic voters made possible from citizenship and by removing
future voters born in Arizona gaining citizenship as
provided by the U.S. Constitution,
14th Amendment, Section 1, is under attack by Arizona white conservatives and
Arizona neo-Nazi fanatics who believe in white supremacy.
This is violation of Civil Rights of all Hispanics living in Arizona. There are
several lawsuits arguing the constitutionality of SB1070 but not one addresses
the violation of Civil Rights voting.
Voting is what gives America its foundation. One person, one vote is guaranteed
by the U.S. Constitution and all efforts to curb voting is a violation of Civil Rights.
The Voting
Rights Act
of 1965
The 1965 Enactment
By
1965,
concerted
efforts to
break the
grip of
state
disfranchisement
had been
under way
for some
time, but
had achieved
only modest
success
overall and
in some
areas had
proved
almost
entirely
ineffectual.
The murder
of
voting-rights
activists in
Philadelphia,
Mississippi,
gained
national
attention,
along with
numerous
other acts
of violence
and
terrorism.
Finally, the
unprovoked
attack on
March 7,
1965, by
state
troopers on
peaceful
marchers
crossing the
Edmund
Pettus
Bridge in
Selma,
Alabama, en
route to the
state
capitol in
Montgomery,
persuaded
the
President
and Congress
to overcome
Southern
legislators'
resistance
to effective
voting
rights
legislation.
President
Johnson
issued a
call for a
strong
voting
rights law
and hearings
began soon
thereafter
on the bill
that would
become the
Voting
Rights Act.
Congress
determined
the existing
federal
anti-discrimination
laws were
not
sufficient
to overcome
the
resistance
by state
officials to
enforcement
of the 15th
Amendment.
The
legislative
hearings
showed the
Department
of Justice's
efforts to
eliminate
discriminatory
election
practices by
litigation
on a
case-by-case
basis had
been
unsuccessful
in opening
up the
registration
process; as
soon as one
discriminatory
practice or
procedure
was proven
to be
unconstitutional
and
enjoined, a
new one
would be
substituted
in its place
and
litigation
would have
to commence
anew.
President
Johnson
signed the
resulting
legislation
into law on
August 6,
1965.
Section 2 of
the Act,
which
closely
followed the
language of
the 15th
amendment,
applied a
nationwide
prohibition
against the
denial or
abridgment
of the right
to vote on
the literacy
tests on a
nationwide
basis. Among
its other
provisions,
the Act
contained
special
enforcement
provisions
targeted at
those areas
of the
country
where
Congress
believed the
potential
for
discrimination
to be the
greatest.
Under
Section 5,
jurisdictions
covered by
these
special
provisions
could not
implement
any change
affecting
voting until
the Attorney
General or
the United
States
District
Court for
the District
of Columbia
determined
the change
did not have
a
discriminatory
purpose and
would not
have a
discriminatory
effect. In
addition,
the Attorney
General
could
designate a
county
covered by
these
special
provisions
for the
appointment
of a federal
examiner to
review the
qualifications
of persons
who wanted
to register
to vote.
Further, in
those
counties
where a
federal
examiner was
serving, the
Attorney
General
could
request that
federal
observers
monitor
activities
within the
county's
polling
place.
The Voting
Rights Act
had not
included a
provision
prohibiting
poll taxes,
but had
directed the
Attorney
General to
challenge
its use. In
Harper
v.
Virginia
State Board
of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), the Supreme Court held Virginia's poll
tax to be
unconstitutional
under the
14th
Amendment.
Between 1965
and 1969 the
Supreme
Court also
issued
several key
decisions
upholding
the
constitutionality
of Section 5
and
affirming
the broad
range of
voting
practices
that
required
Section 5
review. As
the Supreme
Court put it
in its 1966
decision
upholding
the
constitutionality
of the Act:
Congress had
found that
case-by-case
litigation
was
inadequate
to combat
wide-spread
and
persistent
discrimination
in voting,
because of
the
inordinate
amount of
time and
energy
required to
overcome the
obstructionist
tactics
invariably
encountered
in these
lawsuits.
After
enduring
nearly a
century of
systematic
resistance
to the
Fifteenth
Amendment,
Congress
might well
decide to
shift the
advantage of
time and
inertia from
the
perpetrators
of the evil
to its
victims.
The 1970 and 1975 Amendments
Congress
extended
Section 5
for five
years in
1970 and for
seven years
in 1975.
With these
extensions
Congress
validated
the Supreme
Court's
broad
interpretation
of the scope
of Section
5. During
the hearings
on these
extensions
Congress
heard
extensive
testimony
concerning
the ways in
which voting
electorates
were
manipulated
through
gerrymandering,
annexations,
adoption of
at-large
elections,
and other
structural
changes to
prevent
newly-registered
black voters
from
effectively
using the
ballot.
Congress
also heard
extensive
testimony
about voting
discrimination
that had
been
suffered by
Hispanic,
Asian and
Native
American
citizens,
and the 1975
amendments
added
protections
from voting
discrimination
for language
minority
citizens.
In
1973, the
Supreme
Court held
certain
legislative
multi-member
districts
unconstitutional
under the
14th
Amendment on
the ground
that they
systematically
diluted the
voting
strength of
minority
citizens in
Bexar
County,
Texas. This
decision in
White v.
Regester,
412 U.S. 755
(1973),
strongly
shaped
litigation
through the
1970s
against
at-large
systems and
gerrymandered
redistricting
plans. In
Mobile
v.
Bolden,
446 U.S. 55
(1980),
however, the
Supreme
Court
required any
constitutional
claim of
minority
vote
dilution
must include
proof of a
racially
discriminatory
purpose, a
requirement
widely seen
as making
such claims
far more
difficult to
prove.
The 1982 Amendments
Congress renewed in 1982 the special provisions
of the Act,
triggered by
coverage
under
Section 4
for
twenty-five
years.
Congress
also adopted
a new
standard,
which went
into effect
in 1985,
providing
how
jurisdictions
could
terminate
(or "bail
out" from)
coverage
under the
provisions
of Section
4.
Furthermore,
after
extensive
hearings,
Congress
amended
Section 2 to
provide a
plaintiff
could
establish a
violation of
the Section
without
having to
prove
discriminatory
purpose.
Reynolds
v.
Sims,
377
U.S.
533
(1964)
was
a
United
States
Supreme
Court
case
that
ruled
state
legislature
districts
had
to
be
roughly
equal
in
population.
The
eight
justices
who
struck
down
state
senate
inequality
based
their
decision
on
the
principle
of
"one
person,
one
vote".
In
his
majority
decision,
Chief
Justice
Earl
Warren
said
"Legislators
represent
people,
not
trees
or
acres.
Legislators
are
elected
by
voters,
not
farms
or
cities
or
economic
interests."
Similarities of South
Africa (Apartheid)
and Arizona
(SB
1070)
South Africa under Apartheid
Apartheid (Afrikaans, separateness) was a system of legal racial segregation
enforced by the National Party government in South Africa between 1948 and 1994,
under which the rights of the majority non-white inhabitants of South Africa
were taken away and minority rule by white persons who were the only persons
could vote was decreed by the "Rule of Law."
Racial segregation in South Africa began in colonial times, but apartheid as an
official policy was introduced following the general election of 1948. New
legislation classified inhabitants into racial groups ("black" and "white"), and residential areas were segregated, by
means of forced removals. From 1958, black persons were deprived of their
citizenship, legally becoming citizens of one of ten tribally based
self-governing homelands called bantustans, four of which became nominally
independent states. The government segregated education, medical care, and other
public services, and provided black persons with services much less in quality to those of
white persons.
Apartheid sparked significant internal resistance and violence as well as a long
trade embargo against South Africa. A series of popular uprisings and
protests were met with the banning of opposition and imprisoning of
anti-apartheid leaders. As unrest spread and became more violent, state
organizations responded with increasing repression and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s failed to quell the mounting opposition and
in 1990, President Frederik Willem de Klerk began negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial democratic elections in 1994, which were won by the
African National Congress under Nelson Mandela. The vestiges of apartheid still
shape South African politics and society.
Precursors of apartheid
The British colonial rulers introduced a system of Pass Laws in the Cape Colony
and Colony of Natal during the 19th century. This stemmed from the
regulation of black persons' movement from the tribal regions to those occupied
by white persons, ruled by the British. Laws were passed not only to
restrict the movement of black persons into these areas, but also to prohibit
their movement from one district to another without a signed pass. Black persons
were not allowed onto the streets of towns in the Cape Colony and Natal after
dark and had to carry their papers at all times.
The Franchise and Ballot Act of 1892 instituted limits based on financial means
and education to the black franchise and the Natal Legislative Assembly Bill of
1894 deprived Indians of the right to vote. In 1905 the General Pass Regulations
Bill denied blacks the vote altogether, limited them to fixed areas and
inaugurated the infamous Pass System. Then followed the Asiatic Registration Act
of 1906 required all Indians to register and carry passes, the South Africa Act
of 1910 that enfranchised whites, gave them complete political control over all
other race groups and removing the right of blacks to sit in parliament, the
Native Land Act of 1913 prevented all blacks, except those in the Cape, from
buying land outside "reserves," the Natives in Urban Areas Bill of 1918 forced
blacks into "locations", the
Urban Areas Act of 1923 which introduced residential segregation and provided
cheap labor for industry led by white persons, the Color Bar Act of 1926,
prevented anyone black from practicing skilled trades, the Native Administration
Act of 1927 made the British Crown, rather than paramount chiefs, the supreme
head over all African affairs, the Native Land and Trust Act of 1936)
complemented the 1913 Native Land Act and, in the same year, the Representation
of Natives Act, which removed previous black voters from the Cape voters' roll.
One of the first pieces of segregating legislation enacted by the Jan Smuts'
United Party government was the Asiatic Land Tenure Bill of 1946, which banned
any further land sales to Indians.
Jan Smuts' United Party government began to move away from the rigid enforcement
of segregationist laws during World War II. Amid fears integration would
eventually lead the nation to racial assimilation, the legislature established
the Sauer Commission to investigate the effects of the United Party's policies.
The commission concluded integration would bring about a "loss of personality"
for all racial groups.
The South African general election in 1948 began the Institution of Apartheid
In the run-up to the 1948 elections, the main Afrikaner nationalist party, the
Herenigde Nasionale Party (Reunited National Party) under the leadership of
Protestant
cleric
Daniel
Francois
Malan,
campaigned
on its
policy of
apartheid. The NP narrowly defeated Smuts's United Party and formed a
coalition government with another Afrikaner nationalist party, the Afrikaner
Party. Malan became the first apartheid prime minister, and the two parties
later merged to form the National Party (NP).
National Party leaders argued South Africa did not comprise a single
nation, but was made up of four distinct racial groups: white and black. These groups were split further into thirteen "nations" or racial
federations. White persons encompassed the English and Afrikaans language groups;
the black populace was divided into ten such groups.
The state passed laws which paved the way for "grand apartheid", which was
centered on separating races on a large scale, by compelling
persons to
live in
separate
places
defined by
race. In
addition,
"petty
apartheid"
laws were
passed. The
principal
apartheid
laws were as
follows:
The first grand apartheid law was the Population Registration Act of 1950, which
formalized racial classification and introduced an identity card for all persons
over the age of eighteen, specifying their racial group. Official teams or
Boards were established to come to an ultimate conclusion on those persons whose
race was unclear. This caused difficulty, especially for black persons,
separating
their
families as
members were
allocated
different
races.
The second pillar of grand apartheid was the Group Areas Act of 1950. Until
then, most settlements had persons of different races living side by side. This
Act put an end to diverse areas and determined where one lived according to
race. Each race was allotted its own area, which was used in later years as a
basis of forced removal. Further legislation in 1951 allowed the
government to demolish black shackland slums and forced white employers to pay
for the construction of housing for those black workers who were permitted to
reside in cities otherwise reserved for white persons.
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act of 1949 prohibited marriage between
persons of different races, and the Immorality Act of 1950 made sexual relations
with a person of a different race a criminal offence.
Under the Reservation of Separate Amenities Act of 1953, municipal grounds could
be reserved for a particular race, creating, among other things, separate
beaches, buses, hospitals, schools and universities. Signboards such as "whites
only" applied to public areas, even including park benches. Black persons
were provided with services greatly inferior to those of whites. An act of 1956 formalized racial discrimination in employment.
Further laws had the aim of suppressing resistance, especially armed resistance,
to apartheid. The Suppression of Communism Act of 1950 banned the South African
Communist Party and any other political party the government chose to label
as 'communist'. Disorderly gatherings were banned, as were certain organizations
that were deemed threatening to the government.
Education was segregated by means of the 1953 Bantu Education Act, which crafted
a separate system of education for African students and was designed to prepare
black persons for lives as a laboring class. In 1959 separate universities
were created for black persons. Existing universities were
not
permitted to
enroll new
black
students.
The
Afrikaans
Medium
Decree of
1974
required the
use of
Afrikaans
and English
on an equal
basis in
high schools
outside the
homelands.
The Bantu Authorities Act of 1951 created separate government structures for
black citizens and was the first piece of legislation established to support the
government's plan of separate development in the Bantustans. The Promotion of
Black Self-Government Act of 1958 entrenched the National Party's policy of
nominally independent "homelands" for black persons. So-called "selfgoverning
Bantu units" were proposed, which would have devolved administrative powers,
with the promise later of autonomy and self-government. The Bantu Investment
Corporation Act of 1959 set up a mechanism to transfer capital to the homelands
in order to create employment there. Legislation of 1967 allowed the government
to stop industrial development in "white" cites and redirect such development to
the "homelands". The Black Homeland Citizenship Act of 1970 marked a new phase
in the Bantustan strategy. It changed the status of black persons living in South
Africa so that they were no longer citizens of South Africa, but became citizens
of one of the ten autonomous territories. The aim was to ensure a demographic
majority of white persons within South Africa by having all ten Bantustans choose
"independence".
Interracial contact in sport was frowned upon, but there were no segregationist
sports laws. The government was able to keep sport segregated using other
legislation, such as the Group Areas Act.
The
government
tightened
existing
pass laws,
compelling
black South
Africans to
carry
identity
documents to
prevent the
migration of
blacks to
"white"
South
Africa. Any
black
residents of
cities had
to be in
employment.
Families
were
excluded,
thus
separating
wives from
husbands and
parents from
children. Up
until 1956,
women were
for the most
part
excluded
from these
pass
requirements
as attempts
to introduce
pass laws
for women
were met
with fierce
resistance.
Disenfranchisement of
black voters
In 1950, D F Malan announced the NP's intention to create a
Colored
Affairs
Department. J.G. Strijdom, Malan's successor as Prime Minister, moved to
strip voting rights from black residents of the Cape Province. The
previous
government
had first
introduced
the Separate
Representation
of Voters
Bill in
parliament
in 1951;
however, a
group of
four voters,
G Harris, WD
Franklin, WD
Collins and
Edgar Deane,
challenged
its validity
in court
with support
from the
United
Party. The
Cape Supreme
Court upheld
the act, but
the Appeal
Court
reversed on
appeal,
finding the
act invalid
because a
two-thirds
majority in
a joint
sitting of
both Houses
of
Parliament
was needed
in order to
change the
entrenched
clauses of
the
Constitution.
The
government
then
introduced
the High
Court of
Parliament
Bill of
1952, which
gave
parliament
the power to
overrule
decisions of
the court.
The Cape
Supreme
Court and
the Appeal
Court
declared
this invalid
too.
In 1955 the Strijdom government increased the number of judges in the Appeal
Court from
five to
eleven, and
appointed
pro-Nationalist
judges to
fill the new
places. In
the same
year they
introduced
the Senate
Act, which
increased
the senate
from 49
seats to 89.
Adjustments
were made
such that
the NP
controlled
77 of these
seats. The parliament met in a joint sitting and
passed the Separate Representation of Voters Act in 1956, which transferred
Black voters from the common voters' roll in the Cape to a new
Black
voters'
roll. Immediately after the vote, the Senate was restored to its
original size. The Senate Act was contested in the Supreme Court, but the
recently enlarged Appeal Court, packed with government-supporting judges,
rejected the application by the Opposition and upheld the Senate Act, and also
the Act to remove Black voters.
Unity among white South Africans
Before South Africa became a republic, politics among white South Africans was
typified by the division between the chiefly-Afrikaner pro-republicans and the
largely English anti-republicans, with the legacy of the Boer War still a
factor for some persons. Once republican status was attained, Verwoerd called for
improved relations and greater accord between those of British descent and the
Afrikaners. He claimed that the only difference now was between those who
supported
apartheid
and those in
opposition
to it. The
ethnic
divide would
no longer be
between
Afrikaans
speakers and
English
speakers,
but rather
white and
black
ethnicities.
Most
Afrikaners
supported
the notion
of unanimity
of white
persons to
ensure their
safety.
White voters
of British
descent were
divided.
Many had
opposed a
republic,
for example
leading to a
majority
"no" vote in
Natal.
Later,
however,
some of them
recognized
the
perceived
need for
white unity,
convinced by
the growing
trend of
decolonization
elsewhere in
Africa,
which left
them
apprehensive.
Harold
Macmillan's
"Wind of
Change"
pronouncement
left the
British
faction
feeling that
Britain had
abandoned
them. The more
conservative English-speakers gave support to Verwoerd; others were troubled
by the severing of ties with Britain and remained loyal to the Crown. They were
acutely
displeased
at the
choice
between
British and
South
African
nationality.
Although
Verwoerd
tried to
bond these
different
blocs, the
subsequent
ballot
illustrated
only a minor
swell of
support, indicating that
a great many English speakers remained apathetic and that Verwoerd had not
succeeded in uniting the white population.
Homeland system
Under the
homeland
system, the
South
African
government
attempted to
divide South
Africa into
a number of
separate
states, each
of which was
supposed to
develop into
a separate
nation-state
for a
different
ethnic
group.
Territorial separation was not a new institution. There were, for example, the
"reserves" created under the British government in the nineteenth century. Under
apartheid, some thirteen per cent of the land was reserved for black homelands,
a relatively small amount compared to the total population, and generally in
economically unproductive areas of the country. The Tomlinson Commission of 1954
justified apartheid and the homeland system, but stated that additional land
ought to be given to the homelands, a recommendation which was not carried
out.
With the accession to power of Dr Hendrik Frensch Verwoerd in 1958, the policy
of "separate development" came into being, with the homeland structure as one of
its cornerstones. Verwoerd came to believe in the granting of independence to
these homelands. The government justified its plans on the basis the
government's policy is, therefore, not a policy of discrimination on the grounds
of race or color, but a policy of differentiation on the ground of nationhood,
of different nations, granting to each self-determination within the borders of
their homelands - hence this policy of separate development."
Under the homelands system, blacks would no longer be citizens of South Africa;
they would instead become citizens of the independent homelands who merely
worked in South Africa as foreign migrant laborers on temporary work permits.
In 1958, the Promotion of Black Self-Government Act was passed, and border
industries and the Bantu Investment Corporation were established to promote
economic development and the provision of employment in or near the homelands.
Many black South Africans who had never resided in their identified homeland
were nonetheless forcibly removed from the cities to the homelands.
Once a homeland was granted its nominal independence, its designated citizens
had their South African citizenship revoked, replaced with citizenship in their
homeland. These persons were then issued passports instead of passbooks. Citizens
of the nominally autonomous homelands also had their South African citizenship
circumscribed, meaning they were no longer legally considered South African.
The South African government attempted to draw an equivalence between their view
of black citizens of the homelands and the problems which other countries faced
through entry of illegal immigrants.
Forced removals
During the 1960s, 1970s and early 1980s, the government implemented a policy of
'resettlement', to force persons to move to their designated "group areas". Some
argue that over three and a half million persons were forced to resettle during
this period. These removals included persons re-located due to slum clearance programs,
labor tenants on white-owned farms, the inhabitants of the
so-called 'black spots', areas of black-owned land surrounded by white farms,
the families of workers living in townships close to the homelands, and 'surplus
persons' from urban areas, including thousands of
persons from the Western Cape
(which was declared a 'Colored Labor Preference Area') who were moved to
the Transkei and Ciskei homelands. The best-publicized forced removals of the
1950s
occurred in
Johannesburg,
when 60,000
persons were
moved to the
new township
of Soweto,
an
abbreviation
for South
Western
Townships.
Until 1955, Sophiatown had been one of the few urban areas where blacks were
allowed to own land, and was slowly developing into a multiracial slum. As
industry in Johannesburg grew, Sophiatown became the home of a rapidly expanding
black workforce, as it was convenient and close to town. It could also boast the
only swimming pool for black children in Johannesburg. As one of the oldest
black settlements in Johannesburg, Sophiatown held an almost symbolic importance
for the 50,000 blacks it contained, both in terms of its sheer vibrancy and its
unique culture. Despite a vigorous ANC protest campaign and worldwide publicity,
the removal of Sophiatown began on 9 February 1955 under the Western Areas
Removal Scheme. In the early hours, heavily armed police entered Sophiatown to
force residents out of their homes and load their belongings onto government
trucks. The residents were taken to a large tract of land, thirteen miles (19
km) from the city centre, known as Meadowlands (that the government had
purchased in 1953). Meadowlands became part of a new planned black city called
Soweto. The Sophiatown slum was destroyed by bulldozers, and a new white suburb
named Triumph was built in its place. This pattern of forced removal
and destruction was to repeat itself over the next few years, and was not
limited to persons of African descent. Forced removals from areas like Cato Manor
(Mkhumbane) in Durban, and District Six in Cape Town, where 55,000 black persons were forced to move to new townships on the Cape Flats, were
carried out under the Group Areas Act of 1950. Ultimately, nearly 600,000
black, Indian and Chinese
persons were moved in terms of the Group Areas Act.
Some 40,000 white persons were also forced to move when land was transferred from
"white South Africa" into the black homelands.
Petty apartheid
The National Party passed a string of legislation which became known as petty
apartheid. The first of these was the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act 55 of
1949, prohibiting marriage between white persons and persons of other races. The
Immorality Amendment Act 21 of 1950 (as amended in 1957 by Act 23) forbade
"unlawful racial intercourse" and "any immoral or indecent act" between a white
person and an black person.
Blacks were not allowed to run businesses or professional practices in those
areas designated as "white South Africa" without a permit. They were supposed to
move to the black "homelands" and set up businesses and practices there.
Transport and civil facilities were segregated. Black buses stopped at black bus
stops and white buses at white ones. Trains, hospitals and ambulances were
segregated. Because of the smaller numbers of white patients and the fact
that white doctors preferred to work in white hospitals, conditions in white
hospitals were much better than those in often overcrowded black hospitals.
Blacks were excluded from living or working in white areas, unless they had a
pass nicknamed the dompas ("dumb pass" in Afrikaans). Only blacks with "Section
10" rights (those who had migrated to the cities before World War II) were
excluded from this provision. A pass was issued only to a black person with
approved work. Spouses and children had to be left behind in black homelands. A
pass was issued for one magisterial district (usually one town) confining the
holder to that area only. Being without a valid pass made a person subject to
arrest and trial for being an illegal migrant. This was often followed by
deportation to the person's homeland and prosecution of the employer (for
employing an illegal migrant). Police vans patrolled the white areas to round up
illegal blacks found there without passes. Black persons were not allowed to
employ white persons in white South Africa.
Although trade unions for black and colored (mixed race) workers had existed
since the early 20th century, it was not until the 1980s reforms a mass
black trade union movement developed.
In the 1970s each black child's education within the Bantu Education system (the
education system practiced in black schools within white South Africa) cost the
state only a tenth of each white child's. Higher education was provided in
separate universities and colleges after 1959. Eight black universities were
created in the homelands. Fort Hare University in the Ciskei (now Eastern Cape)
was to register only Xhosa-speaking students. Sotho, Tswana, Pedi and Venda
speakers were placed at the newly-founded University College of the North at
Turfloop, while the University College of Zululand was launched to serve Zulu
scholars. Coloreds and Indians were to have their own establishments in the
Cape and Natal respectively.
In addition, each black homeland controlled its own separate education, health
and police system. Blacks were not allowed to buy hard liquor. They were able
only to buy state-produced poor quality beer.
Public beaches were racially segregated. Public swimming pools, some pedestrian
bridges, drive-in cinema parking spaces, graveyards, parks, and public toilets
were segregated. Cinemas and theatres in white areas were not allowed to admit
blacks. There were practically no cinemas in black areas. Most restaurants and
hotels in white areas were not allowed to admit blacks except as staff. Black
Africans were prohibited from attending white churches under the Churches Native
Laws Amendment Act of 1957. This was, however, never rigidly enforced, and
churches were one of the few places races could mix without the interference of
the law. Blacks earning 360 rand a year, 30 rand a month, or more had to pay
taxes while the white threshold was more than twice as high, at 750 rand a year,
62.5 rand per month. On the other hand, the taxation rate for whites was
considerably higher than that for blacks.
Blacks could never acquire land in white areas. In the homelands, much of the
land belonged to a 'tribe', where the local chieftain would decide how the land
had to be utilized. This resulted in white persons owning almost all the
industrial and agricultural lands and much of the prized residential land. Most
blacks were stripped of their South African citizenship when the "homelands"
became "independent". Thus, they were no longer able to apply for South African
passports. Eligibility requirements for a passport had been difficult for blacks
to meet, the government contending that a passport was a privilege, not a right.
As such, the government did not grant many passports to blacks. Apartheid
pervaded South African culture, as well as the law. This was reinforced by much
of the media, and the lack of opportunities for the races to mix in a social
setting entrenched social distance between persons.
Colored classification
The population was classified into four groups: Black, White, Indian, and
Colored. (These terms are capitalized to denote their legal definitions in
South African law). The Colored group included persons of mixed Bantu, Khoisan,
and European descent (with some Malay ancestry, especially in the Western Cape).
The Apartheid bureaucracy devised complex (and often arbitrary) criteria at the
time that the Population Registration Act was implemented to determine who was
Colored. Minor officials would administer tests to determine if someone should
be categorized either Colored or Black, or if another person should be
categorized either
Colored or White. Different members of the same family found
themselves in different race groups. Further tests determined membership of the
various sub-racial groups of the Coloreds. Many of those who formerly belonged
to this racial group are opposed to the continuing use of the term "colored" in
the post-apartheid era, though the term no longer signifies any legal meaning.
The expressions 'so-called Colored' (Afrikaans sogenaamde Kleurlinge) and
'brown persons' (bruinmense) acquired a wide usage in the 1980s.
Discriminated against by apartheid, Coloreds were as a matter of state policy
forced to live in separate townships in some cases leaving homes their families
had occupied for generations and received an inferior education, though better
than that provided to Black South Africans. They played an important role in the
anti-apartheid movement: for example the African Political Organization
established in 1902 had an exclusively colored membership.
Voting rights were denied to Coloreds in the same way that they were denied to
blacks from 1950 to 1983. However, in 1977 the NP caucus approved proposals to
bring colored and Indians into central government. In 1982, final
constitutional proposals produced a referendum among white voters, and the
Tricameral Parliament was approved. The Constitution was reformed the following
year to allow the Colored and Asian minorities participation in separate Houses
in a Tricameral Parliament, and Botha became the first Executive State
President. The theory was that the Colored minority could be granted voting
rights, but the Black majority were to become citizens of independent homelands.
These separate arrangements continued until the abolition of apartheid. The
Tricameral reforms led to the formation of the (anti-apartheid) UDF as a vehicle
to try and prevent the co-option of coloreds and Indians into an alliance with
white South Africans. The subsequent battles between the UDF and the NP
government from 1983 to 1989 were to become the most intense period of struggle
between left-wing and right-wing South Africans.
Women under apartheid
Colonialism
and
apartheid
had a major
impact on
women since
they
suffered
both racial
and gender
discrimination.
Oppression
against
African
women was
different
from
discrimination
against men.
They had
very few or
no legal
rights, no
access to
education
and no right
to own
property.
Jobs were
often hard
to find but
many African
women worked
as
agricultural
or domestic
workers
though wages
were
extremely
low, if
existent.
Children
suffered
from
diseases
caused by
malnutrition
and sanitary
problems,
and
mortality
rates were
therefore
high. The
controlled
movement of
African
workers
within the
country
through the
Natives
Urban Areas
Act of 1923
and the
pass-laws,
separated
family
members from
one another
as men
usually
worked in
urban
centers,
while women
were forced
to stay in
rural areas.
Marriage law
and births were also controlled by the
government and the pro-apartheid Dutch Reformed Church, who tried to restrict
African birth rates.
Other minorities
Defining
its East
Asian
population,
a minority
in South
Africa who
do not
appear to
belong to
any of the
four
designated
groups, was
a constant
dilemma for
the
apartheid
government.
Chinese
South
Africans who
were
descendants
of migrant
workers who
came to work
in the gold
mines around
Johannesburg
in the late
19th
century,
were
classified
as "Other
Asian" and
hence
"non-white",
whereas
immigrants
from Japan
and Taiwan,
with which
South Africa
maintained
diplomatic
and economic
relations,
were
considered
"honorary
whites" with
the same
privileges
as normal
whites.
Conservatism
The National Party government implemented, alongside apartheid, a
program of
social conservatism. Pornography, gambling and other such vices were
banned. Cinemas, shops selling alcohol and most other businesses were forbidden
from operating on Sundays. Abortion, homosexuality and sex education were also
restricted;
abortion was
legal only
in cases of
rape or if
the mother's
life was
threatened.
Television was not introduced until 1976 because the government viewed it as
dangerous. Television was also run on apartheid lines - TV1 broadcast in
Afrikaans and English (geared to a white audience), TV2 in Zulu and Xhosa and
TV3 in Sotho, Tswana and Pedi (both geared to a black audience), and TV4 mostly
showed programs for an urban-black audience.
Internal resistance to South African apartheid
The system of apartheid sparked significant internal resistance.
The
government
responded to
a series of
popular
uprisings
and protests
with police
brutality,
which in
turn
increased
local
support for
the armed
resistance
struggle. Internal resistance to the apartheid system in South Africa came
from several sectors of society and saw the creation of organizations dedicated
variously to peaceful protests, passive resistance and armed insurrection.
In 1949 the youth wing of the African National Congress (ANC) took control of
the organization and started advocating a radical black nationalist program.
The new young leaders proposed that white authority could only be overthrown
through mass campaigns. In 1950 that philosophy saw the launch of the Program
of Action, a series of strikes, boycotts and civil disobedience actions that led
to occasionally violent clashes with the authorities.
In 1959 a group of disenchanted ANC members formed the Pan Africanist Congress
(PAC), which organized a demonstration against pass books on 21 March 1960. One
of those protests was held in the township of Sharpeville, where 69 persons were
killed by police in the Sharpeville massacre.
In the wake of the Sharpeville incident the government declared a state of
emergency. More than 18 000 persons were arrested, including leaders of the ANC
and PAC, and both Organizations were banned. The resistance went underground,
with some leaders in exile abroad and others engaged in campaigns of domestic
sabotage and terrorism.
In May 1961, prior to the declaration of South Africa as a Republic, an assembly
representing the banned ANC called for negotiations between the members of the
different ethnic groupings, threatening demonstrations and strikes during the
inauguration of the Republic if their calls were ignored.
When the government overlooked them, the strikers (among the main organizers was
a 42-year old, Thembu-origin Nelson Mandela) carried out their threats. The
government countered swiftly by giving police the authority to arrest persons
for up to
twelve days
and
detaining
many strike
leaders amid
numerous
cases of
police
brutality. Defeated, the protesters called off their strike. The ANC
then chose to launch an armed struggle through a newly formed military wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), which would perform acts of sabotage on tactical state
structures. Its first sabotage plans were carried out on 16 December 1961, the
anniversary of the Battle of Blood River.
In the 1970s the Black Consciousness Movement was created by tertiary students
influenced by the American Black Power movement. BC endorsed black pride and
African customs and did much to alter the feelings of inadequacy instilled among
black persons by the apartheid system. The leader of the movement, Steve Biko,
was taken into custody on 18 August 1977 and was murdered in detention.
In 1976 secondary students in Soweto took to the streets in the Soweto uprising
to protest against forced tuition in Afrikaans. On 16 June, police opened fire
on students in what was meant to be a peaceful protest. According to official
reports 23 persons were killed, but news agencies put the number as high as 600
killed and
4000
injured. In the following years several student
Organizations were formed with the goal of protesting against apartheid, and
these Organizations were central to urban school boycotts in 1980 and 1983 as
well as rural boycotts in 1985 and 1986.
In parallel to student protests, labor unions started protest action in 1973
and 1974. After 1976 unions and workers are considered to have played an
important role in the struggle against apartheid, filling the gap left by the
banning of political parties. In 1979 black trade unions were legalized and
could engage in collective bargaining, although strikes were still illegal.
At roughly the same time churches and church groups also emerged as pivotal
points of resistance. Church leaders were not immune to prosecution, and certain
faith-based Organizations were banned, but the clergy generally had more freedom
to criticize the government than militant groups did.
Although the majority of whites supported apartheid, some 20 percent did not.
Parliamentary opposition was galvanized by Helen Suzman, Colin Eglin and Harry
Schwarz who formed the Progressive Federal Party. Extra-parliamentary resistance
was largely centered in the South African Communist Party and women's
Organization the Black Sash. Women were also notable in their involvement in
trade union Organizations and banned political parties.
Commonwealth
South Africa's policies were subject to international scrutiny in 1960, when
British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan criticized them during his celebrated
Wind of Change speech in Cape Town. Weeks later, tensions came to a head in the
Sharpeville Massacre, resulting in more international condemnation. Soon
thereafter, Verwoerd announced a referendum on whether the country should become
a republic. Verwoerd lowered the voting age for whites to eighteen and included
whites in South West Africa on the voter's roll. The referendum on 5 October
that year asked whites, "Are you in favor of a Republic for the Union?", and 52
percent voted "Yes".[69]
As a consequence of this change of status, South Africa needed to reapply for
continued membership of the Commonwealth, with which it had privileged trade
links. Even though India became a republic within the Commonwealth in 1947 it
became clear that African and Asian member states would oppose South Africa due
to its apartheid policies. As a result, South Africa withdrew from the
Commonwealth on 31 May 1961, the day that the Republic came into existence.
United Nations
"We speak out to put the world on guard against what is happening in South
Africa. The brutal policy of apartheid is applied before the eyes of the nations
of the world. The persons of Africa are compelled to endure the fact that on the
African continent the superiority of one race over another remains official
policy, and that in the name of this racial superiority murder is committed with
impunity. Can the United Nations do nothing to stop this?"
UN Security
Council
agreed on
concerted
action
against the
apartheid
regime,
demanding an
end to
racial
separation
and
discrimination
At the first UN gathering in 1946, South Africa was placed on the agenda. The
primary subject in question was the handling of South African Indians, a great
cause of divergence between South Africa and India. In 1952, apartheid was again
discussed in the aftermath of the Defiance Campaign, and the UN set up a task
team to keep watch on the progress of apartheid and the racial state of affairs
in South Africa. Although South Africa's racial policies were a cause for
concern, most countries in the UN concurred this was a domestic affair,
which fell outside the UN's jurisdiction.
In April 1960, the UN's conservative stance on apartheid changed following the
Sharpeville massacre, and the Security Council for the first time agreed on
concerted action against the apartheid regime, demanding an end to racial
separation and discrimination. From 1960 the ANC began a campaign of armed
struggle of which there would later be a charge of 193 acts of terrorism from
19611963, mainly bombings and murders of civilians.
Instead, the South African government then began further suppression, banning
the ANC and PAC. In 1961, UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjφld stopped over in
South Africa and subsequently stated he had been unable to reach agreement
with Prime Minister Verwoerd.
On 6
November
1962, the
United
Nations
General
Assembly
passed
Resolution
1761,
condemning
South
African
apartheid
policies. In
1966, the UN
held the
first of
many
colloquiums
on
apartheid.
The General
Assembly
announced 21
March as the
International
Day for the
Elimination
of Racial
Discrimination,
in memory of
the
Sharpeville
massacre. In
1971, the
General
Assembly
formally
denounced
the
institution
of
homelands,
and a motion
was passed
in 1974 to
expel South
Africa from
the UN, but
this was
vetoed by
France,
Britain and
the United
States of
America, all
key trade
associates
of South
Africa.
On 7 August 1963 the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 181
calling for a voluntary arms embargo against South Africa, and in the same year,
a Special Committee Against Apartheid was established to encourage and oversee
plans of action against the regime. From 1964, the US and Britain discontinued
their arms trade with South Africa. It also condemned the Soweto massacre in
Resolution 392. In 1977, the voluntary UN arms embargo became mandatory with the
passing of United Nations Security Council Resolution 418.
Economic sanctions against South Africa were also frequently debated as an
effective way of putting pressure on the apartheid government. In 1962, the UN
General Assembly requested that its members sever political, fiscal and
transportation ties with South Africa. In 1968, it proposed ending all cultural,
educational and sporting connections as well. Economic sanctions, however, were
not made mandatory, because of opposition from South Africa's main trading
partners.
In 1978 and 1983 the United Nations condemned South Africa at the World
Conference Against Racism, and a significant divestment movement started,
pressuring investors to disinvest from South African companies or companies that
did business with South Africa.
After much
debate, by
the late
1980s the
United
States, the
United
Kingdom, and
23 other
nations had
passed laws
placing
various
trade
sanctions on
South
Africa. A
divestment
movement in
many
countries
was
similarly
widespread,
with
individual
cities and
provinces
around the
world
implementing
various laws
and local
regulations
forbidding
registered
corporations
under their
jurisdiction
from doing
business
with South
African
firms,
factories,
or banks.
Organization for African Unity
The
Organization of African Unity (OAU)
was created
in 1963. Its
primary
objectives
were to
eradicate
colonialism
and improve
social,
political
and economic
situations
in Africa.
It censured
apartheid
and demanded
sanctions
against
South
Africa.
African
states
agreed to
aid the
liberation
movements in
their fight
against
apartheid.
In 1969,
fourteen
nations from
Central and
East Africa
gathered in
Lusaka,
Zambia, and
formulated
the 'Lusaka
Manifesto',
which was
signed on 13
April by all
of the
countries in
attendance
except
Malawi. This manifesto was later taken on by both the OAU
and the
United
Nations.
The Lusaka Manifesto summarized the political situations of self-governing
African
countries,
condemning
racism and
inequity,
and calling
for black
majority
rule in all
African
nations. It did not rebuff South Africa
entirely, though, adopting an appeasing manner towards the apartheid government,
and even recognizing its autonomy. Although African leaders supported the
emancipation
of black
South
Africans,
they
preferred
this to be
attained
through
peaceful
means.
South Africa's negative response to the Lusaka Manifesto and rejection of a
change to her policies brought about another OAU announcement in October 1971.
The
Mogadishu
Declaration
declared
that South
Africa's
rebuffing of
negotiations
meant that
her black
persons
could only
be freed
through
military
means, and
that no
African
state should
converse
with the
apartheid
government. Henceforth,
it would be up to South Africa to keep contact with other African states.
Outward-looking policy
In 1966, B.J. Vorster was made South African Prime Minister. He was not prepared
to dismantle apartheid, but he did try to redress South Africa's isolation and
to revitalize the country's global reputation, even those with black-ruled
nations in Africa. This he called his "Outward-Looking" policy; the buzzwords
for his strategy were "dialogue" and "dιtente", signifying a reduction of
tension.
Vorster's willingness to talk to African leaders stood in contrast to Verwoerd's
refusal to engage with leaders such as Abubakar Tafawa Balewa of Nigeria in 1962
and Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia in 1964. In 1966, Vorster met with the heads of the
neighboring states of Lesotho, Swaziland and Botswana. In 1967, Vorster offered
technological and financial aid to any African state prepared to receive it,
asserting that no political strings were attached, aware that many African
states needed financial aid despite their opposition to South Africa's racial
policies. Many were also tied to South Africa economically because of their
migrant labor population working on the South African mines. Botswana, Lesotho
and Swaziland remained outspoken critics of apartheid, but depended on South
Africa's economic aid.
Malawi was the first country not on South African borders to accept South
African aid. In 1967, the two states set out their political and economic
relations, and, in 1969, Malawi became the only country at the assembly which
did not sign the Lusaka Manifesto condemning South Africa' apartheid policy. In
1970, Malawian president Hastings Banda made his first and most successful
official stopover in South Africa.
Associations with Mozambique followed suit and were sustained after that country
won its sovereignty in 1975. Angola was also granted South African loans. Other
countries which formed relationships with South Africa were Liberia, Ivory
Coast, Madagascar, Mauritius, Gabon, Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the
Congo), Ghana and the Central African Republic. Although these states condemned
apartheid (more than ever after South Africa's denunciation of the Lusaka
Manifesto), South Africa's economic and military dominance meant that they
remained dependent on South Africa to varying degrees.
Cultural and sporting isolation of South Africa
South Africa's isolation in sport began in the mid 1950s and increased
throughout the 1960s. Apartheid forbade multiracial sport, which meant that
overseas teams, by virtue of their having players of diverse races, could not
play in South Africa. In 1956, the International Table Tennis Federation severed
its ties with the all-white South African Table Tennis Union, preferring the
non-racial South African Table Tennis Board. The apartheid government responded
by confiscating the passports of the Board's players so that they were unable to
attend international games.
In 1959, the non-racial South African Sports Association (SASA) was formed to
secure the rights of all players on the global field. After meeting with no
success in its endeavors to attain credit by collaborating with white
establishments, SASA approached the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in
1962, calling for South Africa's expulsion from the Olympic Games. The IOC sent
South Africa a caution to the effect that, if there were no changes, they would
be barred from the 1964 Olympic Games. The changes were initiated, and in
January 1963, the South African Non-Racial Olympic Committee (SANROC) was set
up. The Anti-Apartheid Movement persisted in its campaign for South Africa's
exclusion, and the IOC acceded in barring the country from the 1964 Games in
Tokyo. South Africa selected a multi-racial team for the next Games, and the IOC
opted for incorporation in the 1968 Games in Mexico. Because of protests from
AAMs and African nations, however, the IOC was forced to retract the invitation.
Foreign complaints about South Africa's bigoted sports brought more isolation.
Racially selected New Zealand sports teams toured South Africa, until the 1970
New Zealand All Blacks rugby tour allowed Maori to go under the status of
'honorary whites'. Huge and widespread protest occurred in New Zealand in 1981
against the Springbok tour, the government spent eight million dollars
protecting games using the army and police force. A planned All Black tour to
South Africa in 1985 remobilized the New Zealand protestors and it was
cancelled. A 'rebel tour' not government sanctioned went ahead in 1986, but
after that sporting ties were cut, and New Zealand made a decision not to convey
an authorized rugby team to South Africa until the end of apartheid.
B. J. Vorster took Verwoerd's place as PM in 1966 and declared that South Africa
would no longer dictate to other countries what their teams should look like.
Although this reopened the gate for sporting meets, it did not signal the end of
South Africa's racist sporting policies. In 1968, Vorster went against his
policy by refusing to permit Basil D'Oliveira, a Colored South African-born
cricketer, to join the English cricket team on its tour to South Africa. Vorster
said that the side had been chosen only to prove a point, and not on merit.
After protests, however, "Dolly" was eventually included in the team. Protests
against certain tours brought about the cancellation of a number of other
visits, like that of an England rugby team in 1969/70.
In 1971, Vorster altered his policies even further by distinguishing multiracial
from multinational sport. Multiracial sport, between teams with players of
different races, remained outlawed; multinational sport, however, was now
acceptable: international sides would not be subject to South Africa's racial
stipulations.
In 1978, Nigeria boycotted the Commonwealth Games because New Zealand's sporting
contacts with the South African government were not considered to be in
accordance with the 1977 Gleneagles Agreement. Nigeria also led the 32-nation
boycott of the 1986 Commonwealth Games because of British prime minister
Margaret Thatcher's ambivalent attitude towards sporting links with South
Africa, significantly affecting the quality and profitability of the Games and
thus thrusting apartheid into the international spotlight.[82]
Sporting bans were revoked in 1993, when conciliations for a democratic South
Africa were well under way.
In the 1960s, the Anti-Apartheid Movements began to campaign for cultural
boycotts of apartheid South Africa. Artists were requested not to present or let
their works be hosted in South Africa. In 1963, 45 British writers put their
signatures to an affirmation approving of the boycott, and, in 1964, American
actor Marlon Brando called for a similar affirmation for films. In 1965, the
Writers' Guild of Great Britain called for a proscription on the sending of
films to South Africa. Over sixty American artists signed a statement against
apartheid and against professional links with the state. The presentation of
some South African plays in Britain and the United States was also vetoed. After
the arrival of television in South Africa in 1975, the British Actors Union,
Equity, boycotted the service, and no British program concerning its
associates could be sold to South Africa. Sporting and cultural boycotts did not
have the same impact as economic sanctions, but they did much to lift
consciousness amongst normal South Africans of the global condemnation of
apartheid.
Western influence
While
international
opposition
to apartheid
grew, the
Nordic
countries in
particular
provided
both moral
and
financial
support for
the ANC. On 21
February 1986 a week before he was murdered Sweden's prime minister Olof
Palme made the keynote address to the Swedish Persons' Parliament Against
Apartheid
held in
Stockholm. In addressing the hundreds of anti-apartheid
sympathizers as well as leaders and officials from the ANC and the
Anti-Apartheid Movement such as Oliver Tambo, Palme declared:
"Apartheid
cannot be
reformed; it
has to be
eliminated."
Other
Western
countries
adopted a
more
ambivalent
position. In
the 1980s,
both the
Reagan and
Thatcher
administrations,
in the USA
and UK
respectively,
followed a
'constructive
engagement'
policy with
the
apartheid
government,
vetoing the
imposition
of UN
economic
sanctions on
South
Africa,
justified by
a belief in
free trade
and a vision
of South
Africa as a
bastion
against
Marxist
forces in
Southern
Africa.
Thatcher
declared the
ANC a
terrorist
Organization,
and in 1987
her
spokesman,
Bernard
Ingham,
famously
said that
anyone who
believed
that the ANC
would ever
form the
government
of South
Africa was
"living in
cloud cuckoo
land."
By the late 1980s, however, with the tide of the Cold War turning and no sign of
a political resolution in South Africa, Western patience with the apartheid
government began to run out. By 1989, a bipartisan Republican/Democratic
initiative in the US favored economic sanctions (realized as the Comprehensive
Anti-Apartheid
Act of
1986), the
release of
Nelson
Mandela and
a negotiated
settlement
involving
the ANC.
Thatcher too
began to
take a
similar
line, but
insisted on
the
suspension
of the ANC's
armed
struggle.
Britain's
significant
economic
involvement
in South
Africa may
have
provided
some
leverage
with the
South
African
government,
with both
the UK and
the US
applying
pressure on
the
government,
and pushing
for
negotiations.
However,
neither
Britain nor
the US were
willing to
apply
economic
pressure
upon their
multinational
interests in
South
Africa, such
as the
mining
company
Anglo
American.
Although a
high-profile
compensation
claim
against
these
companies
was thrown
out of court
in 2004,
the US
Supreme
Court in May
2008 upheld
an appeal
court ruling
allowing
another
lawsuit that
seeks
damages of
more than
$400 billion
from major
international
companies
which are
accused of
aiding South
Africa's
apartheid
system.
South African Border War, Angolan civil war, and Cuba in Angola
By 1966, SWAPO launched guerilla raids from
neighboring countries against South
Africa's occupation of South-West Africa (present day Namibia). Initially South
Africa fought a counter-insurgency war against SWAPO. This conflict deepened
after Angola gained its independence in 1975 under the leadership of the leftist
Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) aided by Cuba. South
Africa, Zaire and the United States sided with the Angolan rival UNITA party
against the MPLA's armed force, FAPLA (Persons's Armed Forces for the Liberation
of Angola).
The
following
struggle
turned into
one of
several late
Cold War
flashpoints
in the
world. The Angolan civil war developed into a
conventional war with South Africa and UNITA on one side against the Angolan
government, the Cubans and SWAPO on the other.
Total onslaught
By 1980,
as
international
opinion
turned
decisively
against the
apartheid
regime, the
government
and much of
the white
population
increasingly
looked upon
the country
as a bastion
besieged by
communism
and radical
black
nationalists.
Considerable
effort was
put into
circumventing
sanctions,
and the
government
even went so
far as to
develop
nuclear
weapons,
with the
help of
Israel. In
2010, The
Guardian
released
South
African
government
documents
that
revealed an
Israeli
offer to
sell
Apartheid
South Africa
nuclear
weapons.
Israel
categorically
denied these
allegations
and claimed
that the
documents
were minutes
from a
meeting
which did
not indicate
any concrete
offer for a
sale of
nuclear
weapons.
Shimon Peres
said that
The Guardian
article was
based on
"selective
interpretation...
and not on
concrete
facts."
The term "front-line states" referred to countries in Southern Africa
geographically near South Africa. Although these front-line states were all
opposed to apartheid, many were economically dependent on South Africa. In 1980,
they formed the Southern African Development Coordination Conference (SADCC),
the aim of which was to promote economic development in the region and hence
reduce dependence on South Africa. Furthermore, many SADCC members also allowed
the exiled ANC and Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) to establish bases in their
countries.
Cross-border raids
South Africa had a policy of attacking guerrilla-bases and safe houses of the
ANC, PAC and SWAPO in neighboring countries beginning in the early 1980s.
These attacks were in retaliation for acts of terror such as bomb explosions,
massacres and guerrilla actions (like sabotage) by ANC, PAC and SWAPO guerrillas
in South Africa and Namibia. The country also aided Organizations in surrounding
countries who were actively combating the spread of communism in southern
Africa. The results of these policies included:
Support for anti-government guerrilla groups such as UNITA in Angola and RENAMO
in Mozambique
South African Defence Force (SADF; now the South African National Defence Force;
SANDF) hit-squad raids into front-line states. Bombing raids were also conducted
into neighboring states. Air and commando raids into Zimbabwe, Zambia and
Botswana
occurred the
same day,
against
selective
ANC targets.
An
assassination
attempt on
Zimbabwean
President
Robert
Mugabe on
December 18,
1981.
A full-scale invasion of Angola: this was partly in support of UNITA, but was
also an attempt to strike at SWAPO bases.
Bomb
attacks in
Lesotho
Kidnapping
of refugees
and ANC
members in
Swaziland by
security
services.
An unsuccessful South African
organized
coup in the
Seychelles
on November
25, 1981.
Targeting of exiled ANC leaders abroad: Joe Slovo's
wife Ruth
First was
killed by a
parcel bomb
in Maputo,
and 'death
squads' of
the Civil
Cooperation
Bureau and
the
Directorate
of Military
Intelligence
attempted to
carry out
assassinations
on ANC
targets in
Brussels,
Paris,
Stockholm
and London.
In 1984, Mozambican president Samora Machel signed the Nkomati Accord with South
Africa's president P.W. Botha, in an attempt to rebuild Mozambique's economy.
South Africa agreed to cease supporting anti-government forces, while the MK was
prohibited from operating in Mozambique. This was a setback for the ANC. Two
years later, President Machel was killed in an air crash in mountainous terrain
in South Africa near the Mozambican border after returning from a meeting in
Zambia. South Africa was accused by the Mozambican government and U.S. Secretary
of State George P. Shultz of continuing its aid to RENAMO and having caused the
accident by
using a
false radio
navigation
beacon to
lure the
aircraft
into
crashing.
This
conspiracy
theory was
never proven
and is still
a subject of
some
controversy,
despite the
South
African
Margo
Commission
finding that
the crash
was an
accident. A
Soviet
delegation
that did not
participate
in the
investigation
issued a
minority
report
implicating
South
Africa.
State security
During the 1980s the government, led by P.W. Botha, became increasingly
preoccupied with security. On the advice of American political scientist Samuel
P. Huntington, Botha's government set up a powerful state security apparatus to
"protect" the state against an anticipated upsurge in political violence that
the reforms were expected to trigger. The 1980s became a period of considerable
political unrest, with the government becoming increasingly dominated by Botha's
circle of generals and police chiefs (known as securocrats), who managed the
various
States of
Emergencies.
Botha's years in power were marked also by numerous military interventions in
the states bordering South Africa, as well as an extensive military and
political campaign to eliminate SWAPO in Namibia. Within South Africa,
meanwhile, vigorous police action and strict enforcement of security legislation
resulted in hundreds of arrests and bans, and an effective end to the ANC's
sabotage campaign.
The government punished political offenders brutally. 40,000 persons were
subjected to whipping as a form of punishment annually. The vast majority
had committed political offences and were lashed ten times for their
trouble. If convicted of treason, a person could be hanged, and the
government executed numerous political offenders in this way.
As the 1980s progressed, more and more anti-apartheid organizations were formed
and affiliated with the UDF. Led by the Reverend Allan Boesak and Albertina
Sisulu, the UDF called for the government to abandon its reforms and instead
abolish apartheid and eliminate the homelands completely.
State of emergency
Serious political violence was a prominent feature of South Africa from 1985 to
1989, as black townships became the focus of the struggle between anti-apartheid
Organizations and the Botha government. Throughout the 1980s, township
persons
resisted apartheid by acting against the local issues that faced their
particular communities. The focus of much of this resistance was against the
local authorities and their leaders, who were seen to be supporting the
government. By 1985, it had become the ANC's aim to make black townships
"ungovernable" (a term later replaced by "persons' power") by means of rent
boycotts and other militant action. Numerous township councils were overthrown
or collapsed, to be replaced by unofficial popular Organizations, often led by
militant youth. Persons' courts were set up, and residents accused of being
government agents were dealt extreme and occasionally lethal punishment. Black
town councillors and policemen, and sometimes their families, were attacked with
petrol bombs, beaten, and murdered by neck lacing, where a burning tyre was
placed around the victim's neck.
On 20 July 1985, State President P.W. Botha declared a State of Emergency in 36
magisterial districts. Areas affected were the Eastern Cape, and the PWV region
("Pretoria, Witwatersrand, Vereeniging"). Three months later the Western
Cape was included as well. An increasing number of Organizations were banned or
listed (restricted in some way); many individuals had restrictions such as house
arrest imposed on them. During this state of emergency about 2,436 persons were
detained under the Internal Security Act. This act gave police and the
military sweeping powers. The government could implement curfews controlling the
movement of persons. The president could rule by decree without referring to the
constitution or to parliament. It became a criminal offence to threaten someone
verbally or possess documents that the government perceived to be threatening.
It was illegal to advise anyone to stay away from work or oppose the government.
It was illegal, too, to disclose the name of anyone arrested under the State of
Emergency until the government saw fit to release that name. Persons could face
up to ten years' imprisonment for these offences. Detention without trial became
a common feature of the government's reaction to growing civil unrest and by
1988, 30,000 persons had been detained. The media was censored, thousands were
arrested and
many were
interrogated
and
tortured.
On 12 June 1986, four days before the ten-year anniversary of the Soweto
uprising, the state of emergency was extended to cover the whole country. The
government amended the Public Security Act, expanding its powers to include the
right to declare "unrest" areas, allowing extraordinary measures to crush
protests in these areas. Severe censorship of the press became a dominant tactic
in the government's strategy and television cameras were banned from entering
such areas. The state broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC)
provided propaganda in support of the government. Media opposition to the system
increased, supported by the growth of a pro-ANC underground press within South
Africa.
In 1987, the State of Emergency was extended for another two years. Meanwhile,
about 200,000 members of the National Union of Mineworkers commenced the longest
strike (three weeks) in South African history. 1988 saw the banning of the
activities of the UDF and other anti-apartheid Organizations.
Much of the violence in the late 1980s and early 1990s was directed at the
government, but a substantial amount was between the residents themselves. Many
died in violence between members of Inkatha and the UDF-ANC faction. It was
later proven that the government manipulated the situation by supporting one
side or the other when it suited it. Government agents assassinated opponents
within South Africa and abroad; they undertook cross-border army and air-force
attacks on suspected ANC and PAC bases. The ANC and the PAC in return exploded
bombs at restaurants, shopping centres and government buildings such as
magistrates courts.
The state of emergency continued until 1990, when it was lifted by State
President F.W. de Klerk.
Final years of apartheid
In the 1960s South Africa had economic growth second only to that of Japan.
Trade with Western countries grew, and investment from the United States, France
and Britain poured in. Resistance among blacks had been crushed. Since 1964
Mandela, leader of the African Nation Congress, had been in prison on Robben
Island just off the coast from Cape Town, and it appeared that South Africa's
security forces could handle any resistance to apartheid.
In 1974, resistance to apartheid was encouraged by Portugal's withdrawal from
Mozambique and Angola, after the 1974 Carnation Revolution. South African troops
withdrew from Angola in early 1976, failing to prevent the liberation forces
from gaining power there, and black students in South Africa celebrated a
victory of black liberation over white resistance.
The Mahlabatini Declaration of Faith, signed by Mangosuthu Buthelezi and Harry
Schwarz in 1974, enshrined the principles of peaceful transition of power and
equality for all. Its purpose was to provide a blueprint for the government of
South Africa by consent and racial peace in a multi-racial society, stressing
opportunity for all, consultation, the federal concept, and a Bill of Rights. It
caused a split in the United Party that ultimately realigned opposition politics
in South Africa, with the formation of the Progressive Federal Party in 1977. It
was the first of such agreements by acknowledged black and white political
leaders in South Africa.
In 1978, the defense minister of the Nationalist Party, Pieter Willem Botha,
became Prime Minister. Botha's all white regime was worried about the Soviet
Union helping revolutionaries in South Africa, and the economy had turned
sluggish. The new government noted that it was spending too much money trying to
maintain the segregated homelands that had been created for blacks and the
homelands were proving to be uneconomic.
Nor was maintaining blacks as a third class working well. The labor of blacks
remained vital to the economy, and illegal black labor unions were flourishing.
Many blacks remained too poor to make much of a contribution to the economy
through their purchasing power - although they were more than 70 percent of the
population. Capitalism functioned on goodwill, and it was with goodwill that
Botha's regime was most concerned - not for the sake of capitalism so much as it
was afraid that an antidote was needed to prevent the blacks from being
attracted to Communism.
The anti-apartheid movements in the United States and Europe were gaining
support for boycotts against South Africa, for the withdrawal of U.S. firms from
South Africa and for the release of Mandela. South Africa was becoming an outlaw
in the world community of nations. Investing in South Africa by Americans and
others was coming to an end and an active policy of disinvestment ensued. The
then ShellBP used to circumvent the oil embargo on the apartheid regime by
buying crude oil from Nigeria and transferring the crude oil from their ship to
oil tankers headed for apartheid South Africa. This was done outside Nigeria's
territorial waters. When Nigeria found out, Shell BP was nationalized. In
retaliation, Margaret Thatcher's government introduced visa requirements for
Nigerians visiting United Kingdom. This was in retaliation for Nigeria refusing
to pay any compensation for the nationalization. Also many South Africans
attended schools in Nigeria. Nelson Mandela has himself at several times
acknowledged the role of Nigeria in the struggle against apartheid.
Tricameral parliament
In the early 1980s, Botha's National Party government started to
recognize the
inevitability of the need to reform apartheid. Early reforms were driven by
a combination of internal violence, international condemnation, changes within
the National Party's constituency, and changing demographics whites constituted
only 16% of the total population, in comparison to 20% fifty years earlier.
In 1983, a new constitution was passed implementing a so-called Tricameral
Parliament, giving coloreds and Indians voting rights and parliamentary
representation in separate houses - the House of Assembly (178 members) for
whites, the House of Representatives (85 members) for coloreds and the House of
Delegates (45 members) for Indians. Each House handled laws pertaining to
its racial group's "own affairs", including health, education and other
community issues. All laws relating to "general affairs" (matters such as
defense, industry, taxation and Black affairs) were handled by a cabinet made up
of representatives from all three houses, where the ruling party in the white
House of Assembly had an unassailable numerical advantage. Blacks,
although making up the majority of the population, were excluded from
representation; they remained nominal citizens of their homelands. The
first Tricameral elections were largely boycotted by Colored and Indian voters,
amid
widespread
rioting.
Reforms and contact with the ANC under Botha
Concerned over the popularity of Mandela, Botha denounced him as an arch-Marxist
committed to violent revolution, but to appease black opinion and nurture
Mandela as a benevolent leader of blacks the government moved Mandela from
Robben Island to a prison in a rural area just outside Cape Town, Pollsmoor
prison, where prison life was easier. And the government allowed Mandela more
visitors, including visits and interviews by foreigners, to let the world know
that Mandela was being treated well.
Black homelands were declared nation-states and pass laws were abolished. Also,
black labor unions were legitimized, the government recognized the right of
blacks to live in urban areas permanently and gave blacks property rights there.
Interest was expressed in rescinding the law against interracial marriage and
also rescinding the law against sex between the races, which was under ridicule
abroad. The spending for black schools increased, to one-seventh of white
children per child, up from on one-sixteenth in 1968. At the same time,
attention was given to strengthening the effectiveness of the police apparatus.
In January 1985, Botha addressed the government's House of Assembly and stated
that the government was willing to release Mandela on condition that Mandela
pledge opposition to acts of violence to further political objectives. Mandela's
reply was read in public by his daughter Zinzi his first words distributed
publicly since his sentence to prison twenty-one years before. Mandela described
violence as the responsibility of the apartheid regime and said with
democracy there would be no need for violence. The crowd listening to the
reading of his speech erupted in cheers and chants. This response helped to
further elevate Mandela's status in the eyes of those, both internationally and
domestically, who opposed apartheid.
Between 1986 and 1988, some petty apartheid laws were repealed. Botha told white
South Africans to "adapt or die" and twice he wavered on the eve of what
were billed as "rubicon" announcements of substantial reforms, although on both
occasions he backed away from substantial changes. Ironically, these reforms
served only to trigger intensified political violence through the remainder of
the eighties as more communities and political groups across the country joined
the resistance movement. Botha's government stopped short of substantial
reforms, such as lifting the ban on the ANC, PAC and SACP and other liberation
Organizations, releasing political prisoners, or repealing the foundation laws
of grand apartheid. The government's stance was that they would not contemplate
negotiating until those Organizations "renounced violence".
By 1987 the growth of South Africa's economy had dropped to among the lowest
rate in the world, and the ban on South African participation in international
sporting events was frustrating many whites in South Africa. Examples of African
states with black leaders and white minorities existed in Kenya and Zimbabwe.
Whispers of South Africa one day having a black President sent more hard line
whites into Rightist parties. Mandela was moved to a four-bedroom house of his
own, with a swimming pool and shaded by fir trees, on a prison farm just outside
Cape Town. He had an unpublicized meeting with Botha, Botha impressing Mandela
by walking forward, extending his hand and pouring Mandela's tea. And the two
had a friendly discussion, Mandela comparing the African National Conference's
rebellion with that of the Afrikaner rebellion, and about everyone being
brothers.
A number of
clandestine
meetings
were held
between the
ANC-in-exile
and various
sectors of
the internal
struggle,
such as
women and
educationalists.
More
overtly, a
group of
white
intellectuals
met the ANC
in Senegal
for talks.
Presidency of F.W. de Klerk
Early in 1989, Botha suffered a stroke; he was prevailed upon to resign in
February 1989. He was succeeded as president later that year by F.W. de
Klerk. Despite his initial reputation as a conservative, De Klerk moved
decisively towards negotiations to end the political stalemate in the country.
In his opening address to parliament on 2 February 1990, De Klerk announced
he would repeal discriminatory laws and lift the 30-year ban on leading
anti-apartheid groups such as the African National Congress, the Pan Africanist
Congress, the South African Communist Party (SACP) and the UDF. The Land Act was
brought to an end. De Klerk also made his first public commitment to release
jailed ANC leader Nelson Mandela, to return to press freedom and to suspend the
death penalty. Media restrictions were lifted and political prisoners not guilty
of common-law crimes were released.
On 11 February 1990, Nelson Mandela was released from Victor Verster Prison
after more than 27 years in prison.
Having been instructed by the UN Security Council to end its long-standing
involvement in South-West Africa /Namibia, and in the face of military stalemate
in Southern Angola, and an escalation in the size and cost of the combat with
the Cubans, the Angolans, and SWAPO forces and the growing cost of the border
war, South Africa negotiated a change of control of this territory; Namibia
officially became an independent state on 21 March 1990.
Negotiations to end apartheid in South Africa
Apartheid was dismantled in a series of negotiations from 1990 to 1993,
culminating in elections in 1994, the first in South Africa with universal
suffrage.
From 1990 to 1996 the legal apparatus of apartheid was abolished. In 1990
negotiations were earnestly begun, with two meetings between the government and
the ANC. The purpose of the negotiations was to pave the way for talks towards a
peaceful transition of power. These meetings were successful in laying down the
preconditions for negotiations - despite the considerable tensions still
abounding within the country.
At the first meeting, the NP and ANC discussed the conditions for negotiations
to begin. The meeting was held at Groote Schuur, the President's official
residence. They released the Groote Schuur Minute which said that before
negotiations commenced political prisoners would be freed and all exiles allowed
to return.
There were fears that the change of power in South Africa would be violent. To
avoid this, it was essential a peaceful resolution between all parties be
reached. In December 1991, the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA)
began negotiations on the formation of a multiracial transitional government and
a new constitution extending political rights to all groups. CODESA adopted a
Declaration of Intent and committed itself to an "undivided South Africa".
Reforms and negotiations to end apartheid led to a backlash among the right-wing
white opposition, leading to the Conservative Party winning a number of
by-elections against NP candidates. De Klerk responded by calling a whites-only
referendum in March 1992 to decide whether negotiations should continue. A
68-percent majority of white voters gave its support, and the victory instilled
in De Klerk and the government a lot more confidence, giving the NP a stronger
position in negotiations.
Thus, when negotiations resumed in May 1992, under the tag of CODESA II,
stronger demands were made. The ANC and the government could not reach a
compromise on how power should be shared during the transition to democracy. The
NP wanted to retain a strong position in a transitional government, as well as
the power to change decisions made by parliament.
Persistent violence added to the tension during the negotiations. This was due
mostly to the intense rivalry between the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) and the
ANC and the eruption of some traditional tribal and local rivalrys between the
Zulu and Xhosa historical tribal affinities, especially in the Southern Natal
provinces. Although Mandela and Buthelezi met to settle their differences, they
could not stem the violence. One of the worst cases of ANC-IFP violence was the
Boipatong massacre of 17 June 1992, when 200 IFP militants attacked the Gauteng
township of Boipatong, killing 45. Witnesses said the men had arrived in
police vehicles, supporting claims that elements within the police and army
contributed to the ongoing violence. When De Klerk tried to visit the scene of
the incident, he was driven away by angry crowds, on whom the police opened
fire, killing three. Mandela argued that de Klerk, as head of state, was
responsible for bringing an end to the bloodshed. He also accused the South
African police of inciting the ANC-IFP violence. This formed the basis for ANC's
withdrawal from the negotiations, and the CODESA forum broke down completely at
this stage.
The Bisho massacre on 7 September 1992 brought matters to a head. The Ciskei
Defence Force killed 29 persons and injured 200 when they opened fire on ANC
marchers demanding the reincorporation of the Ciskei homeland into South Africa.
In the aftermath, Mandela and De Klerk agreed to meet to find ways to end the
spiraling violence. This led to a resumption of negotiations.
Right-wing violence also added to the hostilities of this period. The
assassination of Chris Hani on 10 April 1993 threatened to plunge the country
into chaos. Hani, the popular general secretary of the South African Communist
Party (SACP), was assassinated in 1993 in Dawn Park in Johannesburg by Janusz
Waluś, an anti-communist Polish refugee who had close links to the white
nationalist Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB). Hani enjoyed widespread support
beyond his constituency in the SACP and ANC and had been recognized as a
potential
successor to
Mandela; his
death
brought
forth
protests
throughout
the country
and across
the
international
community,
but
ultimately
proved a
turning
point, after
which the
main parties
pushed for a
settlement
with
increased
determination. On 25 June 1993, the AWB used an armored vehicle to crash
through the
doors of the
World Trade
Centre where
talks were
still going
ahead under
the
Negotiating
Council,
though this
did not
derail the
process.
In addition to the continuing "black-on-black" violence, there were a number of
attacks on white civilians by the PAC's military wing, the Azanian Persons's
Liberation Army (APLA). The PAC was hoping to strengthen their standing by
attracting the support of the angry, impatient youth. In the St James Church
massacre on 25 July 1993, members of the APLA opened fire in a church in Cape
Town, killing 11 members of the congregation and wounding 58.
In 1993, de Klerk and Mandela were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize "for
their work for the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime, and for laying
the foundations for a new democratic South Africa".
Violence persisted right up to the 1994 elections. Lucas Mangope, leader of the
Bophuthatswana homeland, declared it would not take part in the elections.
It had been decided, once the temporary constitution had come into effect,
the homelands would be incorporated into South Africa, but Mangope did not want
this to happen. There were strong protests against his decision, leading to a
coup d'ιtat in Bophuthatswana on 10 March which deposed Mangope, despite the
intervention of white right-wingers hoping to maintain him in power. Three AWB
militants were killed during this intervention, and harrowing images were shown
on national television and in newspapers across the world.
Two days before the elections, a car bomb exploded in Johannesburg, killing
nine. The day before the elections, another one went off, injuring
thirteen. Finally, though, at midnight on 26, 27 April 1994, the old flag was
lowered, and the old (now co-official) national anthem Die Stem ("The Call") was
sung, followed by the raising of the new rainbow flag and singing of the other
co-official anthem, Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika ("God Bless Africa").
South African general election, 1994
The election was held on 27 April 1994 and went off peacefully throughout the
country as 20,000,000 South Africans cast their votes. There was some difficulty
in organizing the voting in rural areas, but, throughout the country, persons
waited patiently for many hours in order to vote amidst a palpable feeling of
goodwill. An extra day was added to give everyone the chance. International
observers agreed that the elections were free and fair.
The ANC won 62.65% of the vote, less than the 66.7% that would have
allowed it to rewrite the constitution. In the new parliament, 252 of its 400
seats went to members of the African National Congress. The NP captured most of
the white votes and became the official opposition party. As well
as deciding the national government, the election decided the provincial
governments, and the ANC won in seven of the nine provinces, with the NP winning
in the Western Cape and the IFP in KwaZulu-Natal. On 10 May 1994, Mandela was
sworn in as South Africa's president. The Government of National Unity was
established, its cabinet made up of twelve ANC representatives, six from the NP,
and three from the IFP. Thabo Mbeki and Frederik Willem de Klerk were made
deputy presidents.
The anniversary of the elections, 27 April, is celebrated as a public holiday in
South Africa known as Freedom Day.
ANC strategy to end Apartheid and "persons' war"
By 1974, the ANC realized that its armed struggle was ineffective against the
Apartheid state. At this time they suffered a reduction in finance from Moscow
and felt an increasing danger of being surpassed by the IFP and the Black
Consciousness movement in South Africa while the ANC itself was in exile.
Therefore in 1978 the ANC sent a delegation to Vietnam to study the tactics used
in their persons war. This resulted in a policy change with the adoption of
The Green
Book:
Lessons from
Vietnam.
This
strategy
adopted by
the ANC
entailed a
dual
approach,
the first
being to
increase
violent
military
activity
against the
general
public by
which the
Apartheid
government
could be
lured into
and accused
of
committing
brutalities
and
therefore
suffer loss
in prestige
and secondly
leveraging
the
political
struggle
with
propaganda
in order to
increase
sympathy
from the
international
community
and to
garner
support from
inside the
South
African
populace.
This would
put the
government
under
immense
pressure in
order to
force it to
make
concessions
during
negotiations
which would
normally not
be made.
The ANC implemented its persons war on 3rd September 1984 with a surge of
violence in Sebokeng and other townships in the Vaal area. Streets were
barricaded and fortified while explosive materials and stones were placed near
the homes of civilian targets by the ANC in preparation for the days unrest.
During this unrest which eventually lasted a month, 4 local councillors were
killed along with 60 other persons.
5,500 persons were killed in political violence by the end of 1989 of whom 700
were put to
death by the
necklace
method by
ANC
activists.
The ANC was
unbanned by
FW de Klerk
in 1990, but
refused to
renounce
violence and
increased
its pressure
on the
government
to allow
its exiles
to return,
which mostly
compromised
13,000 armed
and trained
MK soldiers.
Violence escalated even though the NP Government was fully committed to a
peaceful transition as military actions were committed against IFP supporters in
August and October 1992 during the Patheni and Folweni massacres where 28
persons
including a Zulu Chief who supported the IFP and his family were killed and 33
injured.
Political propaganda was however continuously applied in order to create the
ruse that the ANC was only pursuing peaceful negotiations. An election date was
forced during the negotiations for 27 April 1994 and in the four months leading
to the election a further spree of violence erupted in which 1,500 persons were
killed in political violence.
The upsurge of violence that began in February 1990 and lasted until the
election cost the lives of 15,000 persons, three times the number killed in the
first five years of the persons war. When political killings reached this
climax, all major apartheid laws (other than the constitution, which had to be
renegotiated) had already been repealed.
The persons war waged by the ANC was very successful in winning a victory for
the ANC and to establish its overall predominance in South African politics
after 1994.[144]
Contrition
The following individuals, who had previously supported apartheid, made public
apologies:
FW de Klerk - "I apologize in my capacity as leader of the NP to the
millions who
suffered
wrenching
disruption
of forced
removals;
who suffered
the shame of
being
arrested for
pass law
offences;
who over the
decades
suffered the
indignities
and
humiliation
of racial
discrimination."
Marthinus
van
Schalkwyk
Adriaan Vlok - who washed the feet of apartheid victim Frank Chikane.
Leon Wessels - who said "I am now more convinced than ever apartheid was a
terrible mistake that blighted our land. South Africans did not listen to the
laughing and the crying of each other. I am sorry I had been so hard of
hearing for so long."
South Africa's Afrikaners and
Arizona Republicans are one and the
same
("A mimetic polyalloy")
Arizona Republicans are the
reincarnation of the Afrikaners who
were the architects of racism as
evident by South Africa's Apartheid, a
system of legal racial segregation
enforced by the National Party
government in South Africa between
1948 and 1994, under which the
rights of the majority non-white
inhabitants of South Africa were
curtailed and minority rule by white
people was maintained.
Chronology of Arizona laws
directed to forcing Hispanic to
leave Arizona
1996: Legislature passes a law
requiring proof of citizenship to
get a driver's license. Russell
Pearce, director of the state Motor
Vehicle Division, wrote the law.
1997: Chandler police and federal
agents spend five days rounding up
suspected illegal immigrants in
downtown neighborhoods. They make
340 arrests, taking some legal
residents into custody. City
officials later pay $500,000 in
legal settlements and spend years
apologizing.
1998: Rep. Tom Smith, R-Phoenix,
proposes a bill to require ID be
shown at the polls. It fails in the
Senate. Another bill requiring proof
of citizenship to register to vote
doesn't get out of committee.
1999: Arizona ranchers ask
lawmakers to call on the National
Guard to come to the border to
suppress an "invasion." Effort goes
nowhere, beyond some lawmakers
reading a proclamation about border
violations.
2000: Voters endorse a requirement
for English immersion in schools,
banning bilingual education. It
passes 63 percent to 37 percent.
2001: Pearce begins first term as
state representative.
Moderate Republicans lose in GOP
primaries, giving Legislature a more
conservative tilt.
Voters approve Proposition 200,
which denies public benefits to
people not in the country legally.
Passes 56 percent to 44 percent.
2006: Pearce introduces a bill to
make it a state crime to be in the
country illegally and to allow peace
officers to question an individual's
immigration status. It also includes
measures to restrict employers from
hiring illegal immigrants. Gov.
Janet Napolitano vetoes the bill.
More than 100,000 march to the
state Capitol to support
comprehensive immigration reform on
the national level. Similar large
rallies are held in cities across
the U.S.
Voters endorse a trio of ballot
measures related to illegal
immigration, including requiring
out-of-state college tuition from
Arizona residents who can't prove
citizenship and denying bail to
illegal immigrants charged with a
crime. They also approve a measure
that makes English the state's
official language. All four ballot
measures pass with 70 percent-plus
of vote.
Legislature approves a bill that
levies fines against employers found
to have hired illegal immigrants.
The bill gets bipartisan support and
is signed by Napolitano.
2008: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe
Arpaio begins conducting immigration
sweeps.
Republicans gain ground in
legislative elections.
January 2009: Republican Jan
Brewer ascends to the Governor's
Office when Napolitano resigns to
join the Obama administration as
Homeland Security secretary.
January 2010: Pearce introduces
Senate Bill 1070.
February: SB 1070 passes Senate
17-13.
April 13: Amended version of SB
1070 passes House 35-21.
April 19: Senate gives final
approval to amended SB 1070 with
vote of 17-11.
April 23: Brewer signs SB 1070
into law.
April 29: Three separate lawsuits
challenging law's constitutionality
are filed in federal court.
April 30: Brewer signs into law SB
2650, which makes changes to SB
1070.
July 29: Arizona's new immigration
law scheduled to go into effect.
Racial segregation in South Africa
began in colonial times, but
apartheid as an official policy was
introduced following the general
election of 1948. New legislation
classified inhabitants into racial
groups "black" and "white," and residential areas
were segregated, sometimes by means
of forced removals. From 1958, black
people were deprived of their
citizenship. The government
segregated education, medical care,
and other public services, and
provided black people with services
inferior to those of white people. (This
is identical to Arizona using tax
credits to fund charter schools
where white children attend rather
than fund public schools where
Hispanic children attend. Biggest
support of racist education program
is Catholic Diocese of Phoenix.)
Apartheid sparked significant
internal resistance and violence as
well as a long trade embargo against
South Africa. A series of popular
uprisings and protests were met with
the banning of opposition and
imprisoning of anti-apartheid
leaders. As unrest spread and became
more violent, state organizations
responded with increasing repression
and state-sponsored violence.
Reforms to apartheid in the 1980s
failed to quell the mounting
opposition, and in 1990 President
Frederik Willem de Klerk began
negotiations to end apartheid,
culminating in multi-racial
democratic elections in 1994, which
were won by the African National
Congress under Nelson Mandela. The
vestiges of apartheid still shape
South African politics and society.
The similarities of South Africa
apartheid and Arizona are starkly
profound and un-American.
In South Africa
apartheid,
Afrikaners were the only ones
eligible to vote and on voter
polling, nearly 100% of Afrikaners
approved of Apartheid policies.
In Arizona, news sources using
Rasmussen Reports daily
tracking
polls
to shows 65% of the nation's voters
strongly approve of Arizona SB 1070.
But the similarities of
Afrikaners or Arizonans
having a majority of voters
strongly approving enforcing Arizona
SB 1070 does not make it right.
SB 1070s defects are likely
unfixable. It seeks attrition
through enforcement and to
discourage and deter unlawful entry
and presence of aliens.
Accordingly, its purpose is
essentially to induce
self-deportation, a federal
responsibility, and to override
decisions assigned by Congress to
federal agencies.
Last word
For a time, the racist anti-Hispanic
vitriolic sentiments toward Arizona
Hispanics and Hispanics living
throughout every town, city, state,
farm, countryside of the United
States will prevail but the words of
Mahatma Gandhi have never been more
timely,
"There
have been tyrants, and murderers,
and for a time they can seem
invincible, but in the end they
always fall. Think of it
always.
The most profound statistic ever
published by the Unites States
Census Bureau: In 2097, 50% of the
entire US population will be
Hispanic.
Next best: In 2050,
30% of the entire US population will
be Hispanic.
All know
change is inevitable.
Change is constant.
How we deal with change becomes the
test of our character.
God Bless America!
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|